Prediction of Annabel Croft vs Pam Teeguarden Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
A. Croft vs P. Teeguarden

Annabel Croft

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Pam Teeguarden

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Croft 1 - 0 Teeguarden

They have played 3 sets in total, with Annabel Croft winning 2 and Pam Teeguarden winning 1. The last match between Annabel Croft and Pam Teeguarden was at the Durban, 23-04-1984, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Annabel Croft getting the victory 6-1 4-6 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Croft	1
Teeguarden	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) Durban(04-23-84)

Stats

Annabel Croft

Pam Teeguarden

A. Croft vs P. Teeguarden H2H Profile

A. Croft	Stats	P. Teeguarden
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
47.79% (130-142)	Career Total W/L	47.87% (315-343)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

A. Croft vs P. Teeguarden Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Annabel Croft has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Pam Teeguarden has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Annabel Croft, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pam Teeguarden has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Annabel Croft has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pam Teeguarden has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Annabel Croft has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Pam Teeguarden winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Annabel Croft has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 23/19), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 18/30). Pam Teeguarden has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 48/36), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 54/63).
Player level: In the last year, Annabel Croft has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Pam Teeguarden has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Annabel Croft winning 1 times and Pam Teeguarden being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Annabel Croft winning 2 and Pam Teeguarden winning 1.
The last match between Annabel Croft and Pam Teeguarden was at the Durban, 23-04-1984, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Annabel Croft getting the victory 6-1 4-6 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Annabel Croft has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Pam Teeguarden has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Annabel Croft has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pam Teeguarden has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Annabel Croft has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pam Teeguarden has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Annabel Croft vs Pam Teeguarden Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. Croft vs P. Teeguarden H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

A. Croft	Stats	P. Teeguarden
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
16	Games Won	9
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

A. Croft Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Oklahoma - 22-02-1988
Q1 Cammy MacgregorC. Macgregor	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Oakland - 15-02-1988
Q1 Claudia MonteiroC. Monteiro	L	7-5 6-7(4) 7-6(4)	Stats
Wellington - 01-02-1988
R4 Terry PhelpsT. Phelps	L	7-6 6-3	Stats
R2 Sybille Niox ChateauS. Niox	W	6-2 6-4	Stats
R3 Akemi NishiyaA. Nishiya	W	5-7 7-5 7-6	Stats

View All

P. Teeguarden Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 27-05-1985
R1 Martina NavratilovaM. Navratilova	L	6-1 6-0	Stats
Oakland - 18-02-1985
Q1 Molly Van NostrandM. Van	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Delray Beach - 05-02-1985
R1 Sabrina GolesS. Goles	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Marco Island - 28-01-1985
Q1 Catherine SuireC. Suire	L	2-6 7-5 6-0	Stats
Key Biscayne - 21-01-1985
Q1 Ginny PurdyG. Purdy	L	3-6 6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

A. Croft vs P. Teeguarden Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

A. Croft	Stats	P. Teeguarden
47.79% (130/142)	YTD Win/Loss	47.87% (315/343)
48.05% (296/320)	Sets Win/Loss	48.86% (729/763)
49.69% (2779/2814)	Games Win/Loss	50.06% (6862/6846)
50.55% (46/45)	Hard Win/Loss	49.32% (72/74)
54.76% (23/19)	Clay Win/Loss	46.15% (54/63)
44.44% (16/20)	Indoor Hard W/L	39.62% (63/96)
37.50% (18/30)	Grass Win/Loss	57.14% (48/36)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
266.53	Average Opponent Rank	108.6
0.00% (0/1)	Slam W/L	57.14% (12/9)
63.64% (7/4)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
37.50% (3/5)	Challenger W/L	58.33% (7/5)
37.84% (14/23)	Futures W/L	49.64% (68/69)
47% (124/266)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	48% (307/646)
100% (2/2)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/2)
43% (3/7)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (6/12)
44% (33/75)	Deciding Set Win %	41% (78/191)
84% (129/108)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (325/266)
16% (129/21)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (325/59)
14% (142/20)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (326/42)